2011 DSOC Secretary/Treasurer Kadri Kalikorm-Rhodes offers her thoughts on the role of SLA, DSOC and special libraries...feel free to leave a response in the comments!
The libraries and information centers we work at are becoming increasingly less like each other, molding themselves more and more to the exact needs and requirements of our host institutions. That also means that the kinds of services we provide varies immensely. In fact, we may end up linked to our fellow professionals by a graduate degree (for most of us) and a little more than the passion for managing information and exemplary customer service, as many of SLA members are becoming high-level subject matter experts in specific research or policy areas, while others end up spending most of our time wrangling KM projects, metatagging or curating electronic publications. Is this inevitable? Pretty much, I think. Look at it one way, it is a question of professional survival. On the other hand, it is also an opportunity to reinvent ourselves and our libraries or information, making both (more) central, more essential, to the core business of the institution we are serving.
So where would that leave SLA, and Social Science Division in particular? Is there a role for them? I believe so. In fact, I think that in this era of increased accountability and demands on our time and resources, SLA (and the annual conference in particular) could be crucial for special librarians (for lack of better common term – you know who you are..) by doing two things: providing an opportunity to network and learn from the experience of others in the same shoes, and by giving members a chance to get quick overviews of new technological developments, catch up with vendors, and learn things not immediately related to any urgent issues burning a hole our inboxes (if you’re anything like me, you spend most of your days on fireman-duty during the rest of the year..). So I am optimistic. But enough about me - what do YOU think?