On 17 November 2009, the Official Google Blog announced that a set of U.S. judicial opinions has been added to the Google Scholar database. From the blog post, Finding the laws that govern us:
You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. Casey), or by topics (like desegregation)
or other queries that you are interested in. For example, go to Google
Scholar, click on the "Legal opinions and journals" radio button, and
try the query separate but equal. Your search results will include links to cases familiar to many of us in the U.S. such as Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education,
which explore the acceptablity of "separate but equal" facilities for
citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. But your
results will also include opinions from cases that you might be less
familiar with, but which have played an important role.
The legal research site LLRX.com has posted an aricle on the topic: Bridging the Digital Divide: A New Vendor in Town? Google Scholar Now Includes Case Law, by John J. DiGilio, 18 November 2009. DiGilio discusses the value and the limitations of the current Google Scholar case law set.
In related news, the folks behind the AltLaw "free legal search engine" website announced on 19 November 2009 that "we will continue to maintain the web site
and search service for a few months, but we will not be adding new
features or new content. AltLaw.org, in its current form, will shut
down in early 2010." From the announcement:
Everything we have done or planned to do with AltLaw,
Google has does better. What else would you expect? Search is their
core business; they have hundreds of brilliant engineers, a vast
computing infrastructure, and billions of dollars invested in it.
While we could see this as the 800-pound gorilla
stomping on our pet project, the truth is that we -- a small academic
group within Columbia Law School -- were never really equipped to
handle the challenges of building and maintaining a state-of-the-art
search engine. When we started out, three years ago, our goal was to
make primary legal research freely available to the public. In that,
we have succeeded: primary legal research is freely available
to the public, not only from Google, but from several start-ups and
non-profits.
Google's blog announcement acknowledged AltLaw, among others:
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the work of
several pioneers, who have worked on making it possible for an average
citizen to educate herself about the laws of the land: Tom Bruce (Cornell LII), Jerry Dupont (LLMC), Graham Greenleaf and Andrew Mowbray (AustLII), Carl Malamud (Public.Resource.Org), Daniel Poulin (LexUM), Tim Stanley (Justia), Joe Ury (BAILII), Tim Wu (AltLaw) and many others.
Recent Comments