This isn't strictly IT related, but I always enjoy it when I hear of other professions encountering the difficulties with copyright that librarians see on a daily basis. The Copyfight blog, which is definitely worth checking out if you haven't seen it yet, just made this post regarding the reproduction of scientific figures:
http://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2007/05/01/fair_use_and_scientific_illustration.php
Photographs and artwork are usually considered under the current laws to be individual pieces of work that cannot be wholly reproduced without compensating the original artist/photographer. Does this also apply to charts and graphs that are merely representations of data? I'm no lawyer, but I think you could make a pretty good argument that fair use does apply to scientific figures. Unless you are doing something very artistic with your data display, there is nothing terribly unique about any given scientific figure. If you can reproduce the underlying data within the bounds of fair use, then it seems like the derivative figure should also be covered.
I suppose this is another one of those cases where easy data transmission has thrown another kink into the chains of copyright law. Not too long ago (I remember these times and I'm not quite yet 30), it was fairly difficult to accurately reproduce images. Now all it takes is a screen shot, a decent quality scanner, or a simple right click and "save as" to make a semi-perfect copy of what may be a copyrighted image. I keep thinking that I'd like copyright law to catch up with the times, but sometimes I prefer the gray areas to what the judges eventually decide.
Recent Comments