"The Congress shall have power ... to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." -- Article I, Section 8, Constitution of the United States.
According to a recent Outsell survey of the corporate world, employees spend over five hours per week using content covered by copyright, and over 80% of workers share copyrighted content with their colleagues at least once a week. But are they confident that their usage is compliant with U.S. copyright law? Well, no.
On Tuesday, September 22, Lee Pharis hosted a half-day professional development program, Copyright or Copywrong? at Exponent in Menlo Park. Pharis, Chair of the San Andreas Chapter PD Committee, organized the event, which featured a speaker from the Copyright Clearance Center. The 20 attendees gathered at 8 a.m. for a continental breakfast, and after thanking Information Express for its sponsorship, the session began. Ample study materials were provided, including a copy of the Constitution of the United States of America!
Dru Zuretti, Education Manager at the CCC, began with a quick overview of the types of "respective writings and discoveries" -- trademarks, patents, trade secrets and copyright. Intellectual Property protected by copyright includes: written works, music, drama, pantomine/dance, images, films, sound recordings, architecture (including the building and blueprints), software, and sculpture. The legal terminology -- author, work, copyright owner, orphan works, etc. -- is key to understanding copyright, so Zuretti carefully defined each. Then she dug right to the heart of copyright as it pertains to the corporate environment. She talked about "fair use," and made the point that it is more a defense to a claim of copyright infringement than an exception to copyright compliance.
Zuretti described the bundle of exclusive rights of the copyright owner -- rights that can be retained or transferred together or separately, complicating the situation with any work. She talked about the limitations placed on these rights, in favor of certain categories of libraries and archives, in Section 108 of the Copyright Act.
Questions from potential attendees were compiled and sent to the speaker earlier in September. In the latter part of this session, Zuretti covered remaining questions from those compiled. There was time for additional questions from the audience, as well.
If you missed this professional development session, but would like to know more about copyright, you may go to the CCC's website, http://www.copyright.com/. Under the "Copyright Central" menu, look for the "Basics" page, and you will find lots of very useful content, including links to international agreements as well as the U. S. Copyright Act.
Are you confident that you have sufficient knowledge of copyright? You still might want to give yourself a quick review by watching the CCC's brief "Copyright Basics" video. at: http://216.183.190.29/ .
If you'd like to give us feedback about this program, please fill out our brief SurveyMonkey form. If you'd like to give us suggestions for future Chapter professional development programs -- specific topics or your preferred format -- please take this survey!
Patricia Parsons & Lee Pharis